Radovich's Revenge

Icon

Blog covering the upcoming NFL CBA negotiations

Death Panels for the NFL!

… or a more reasonable take on health care for those who get their bodies crunched every Sunday.

Stefan Fastis, of A Few Seconds of Panic: A 5-Foot-8, 170-Pound, 43-Year-Old Sportswriter Plays in the NFL, pens an opinion piece in today’s New York Times about the issue of health care and injuries in today’s NFL.

N.F.L. players often get excellent medical treatment, but the primary goal is to return them to the field as quickly as possible. Players are often complicit in playing down the extent of their injuries. Fearful of losing their jobs — there are no guaranteed contracts in the N.F.L. — they return to the huddle still hurt.

I witnessed this play-first ethos when the Denver Broncos allowed me to join the team as a place-kicker during training camp in 2006 and write a book on the experience. One player told me that, the previous year, a team trainer had dismissed his complaints of a knee injury; a few days later, he tore an anterior cruciate ligament. Another Bronco, now retired, told me the team gave him a diagnosis of a minor calf strain; an outside doctor found it was a severe muscle tear.

Fastis recommends that the new CBA include a few common-sense provisions to give NFL players more opportunities to extend their careers:

  1. Take away the team-employed doctors and replace them with a league-wide medical staff that focuses on the best interest of the players, rather than the team.
  2. Doctors report their diagnoses directly to the players first before the team.
  3. Require every team to report all injuries, no matter how small.  Good luck getting that one approved the Jets!

Filed under: non-guaranteed contracts, other CBA provisions, ,

Post-Vacation Blogging: Dragon Slayer

Here’s some stories I missed while at the beach:

  • CincyJungle breaks down their reasons for wanting a rookie salary cap. So does the Indianapolis Colts front office.
  • This random guy with a massive face wants a rookie salary cap, too.
  • The Charlotte Observer quotes Muhsin Muhammad expressing concerns that a longer regular season might have negative health effects on the players.
  • Good quote from the same story: Carolina linebacker Na’il Diggs called an 18-game season “a dragon we’ll have to slay when it comes.” “I’m sure it’ll be more money for television and all that, but for us, maybe not so good,” said Diggs. “It’s going to be taxing. Sixteen games is (already) a pretty good tearing up of the body.”
  • Sports Illustrated’s John Lopez wants to extend the season.
  • ProFootballTalk digs into the CBA, noting that the Broncos CANNOT send Brandon Marshall home with pay to just get him out of the locker room (following his suspension, of course) due to a rule introduced in the last CBA.
  • IDislikeYourFavoriteTeam.com is working his way through the CBA issues, too.

Filed under: extended schedule, other CBA provisions, personal conduct policy, player contracts, rookie salary cap, , , , , , ,

Brandon Marshall & Trade Demands

Andrew Brandt, over at the National Football Post, has a piece up decrying the steps taken by players who are no longer happy with their contracts.  It’s worth a look, though to summarize:  (1) these holdouts happen all the time, (2) not fair, (3) someone should do something about this, (4) I have no idea what that should be, but it should be in the CBA.

Eh.  Have a read. The NFP site is fancy.

Filed under: other CBA provisions, player contracts, , , ,

Random CBA Provision

Here’s an interesting (for the lawyers or insurers) article from SportsLawTalk about the NFL and workers’ compensation off-sets:

SLT- Would you tell us about “credit” or offset issue that has been a point of contention for many years between NFL clubs and injured players seeking workers’ compensation disability payments?

RW- This issue has been litigated for nearly 30 years in jurisdictions around the country. The clubs have contended that the standard player contract and the law in many states entitles them to offset post injury salary or injury protection payments against workers’ compensation benefits on a “dollar for dollar” basis. This would effectively eliminate or greatly devaluate most workers’ compensation claims since NFL salaries greatly exceed workers’ compensation payments. The NFLPA and its workers’ compensation panel attorneys have contended there should only be an offset during the time salary payments are actually made. Our firm successfully litigated this issue both against the Miami Dolphins and Jacksonville Jaguars. In both cases the court ruled the offset should be applied on a “time” and not a “dollar for dollar” basis. The current NFL CBA for the first time now provides a uniform formula for determining how offsets should be taken so, for the time being the issue has been laid to rest

I think it’s a fairly settled issue from the last CBA, but who knows . . . maybe the owners want a different formula

Filed under: other CBA provisions, ,

Follow Us:

Top Posts

  • None

Our Tweeter Feeder

Archives

RSS NFL/NFLPA/CBA Tweets

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.